Hi Vivek! Sorry about the trouble but we have it currently structured that StockGPT the chatbot and Substack blog with spreadsheets insights are 2 separate memberships. These both are intended to serve distinct purposes and hosted completely separate for that reason. I know this can be frustrating right now so I’m gonna give you a free membership to StockGPT.chat the chatbot for life and everything related to that. Look out for an email from me from StockGPT.chat for that. Thx
Yes, it would be outdated as I have shared with you that we do not support leveraged ETF as it does skew the data so we have tried to objectively and fairly analyze the data. If we use leveraged ETF in the same evaluation it would make the prediction engine weaker in quality as the dataset become redundant.
Yes, stockgpt chatbot has price that is outdated by a few days because it has been taking too long to get data uploaded in time each day. This is a limitation that requires us to build a solution that is a bit more complex than anticipated so we are on it.
As per adding leveraged ETFs, maybe i can build something separate that shows recommendations outside the current ETF recommendations structure. I replied to your previously message about this saying that the only reason we exclude this is because it skews the data of the overall system since the underlying security is just leverage added on top of its non-leveraged product hence making the data redundant. Adding this would mean we are giving double or triple weight to something that is synthetic. Ultimately even if I created something new, to account for all this, I would have to give the leveraged product the same score and rating as it’s unleveraged counterpart meaning if you are interested in the TQQQ you could just look at the ranking and rating of the QQQ as it would work out the same.
We have that on the site. Have you checked the mid term a d historical data section on the site or this substack? Like go to stockgpt.chat and look at what powers StockGPT section and see the mid term and historical data section and let me know what you think
I don’t think it would be a good idea to add it to the spreadsheet and here is why... The stocks we are ranking as “buy” or “strong buy” is because those stocks have become undervalued and oversold which means in the recent past they may have actually gone down but they have only gone down just enough to still be considered a great value. If we show their performance of the recent past many people may get demotivated from being interested in these stocks thinking these may continue to perform bad in the future as well. We have done a ton of analysis to know these are the stocks that outperforms but most people’s flawed beliefs are that stocks that are in an uptrend are those that performs which we have disproven many times over across 30 years of market analysis. Therefore, showing anything that feels conflicting to our message would be counterproductive. Given this explanation, do you agree its best to leave that out?
I am unable to logon to my paid account. This is very frustrating. Why can you not take care of Basic things for your paid subscribers?
Hi Vivek! Sorry about the trouble but we have it currently structured that StockGPT the chatbot and Substack blog with spreadsheets insights are 2 separate memberships. These both are intended to serve distinct purposes and hosted completely separate for that reason. I know this can be frustrating right now so I’m gonna give you a free membership to StockGPT.chat the chatbot for life and everything related to that. Look out for an email from me from StockGPT.chat for that. Thx
Stockgpt is outdated by 1 year! just check price of TECL or other levraged ETFs
Yes, it would be outdated as I have shared with you that we do not support leveraged ETF as it does skew the data so we have tried to objectively and fairly analyze the data. If we use leveraged ETF in the same evaluation it would make the prediction engine weaker in quality as the dataset become redundant.
I see your point. I can get that infofrom Stockcharts.com where I also have a paid subscription for number of years.
Would you please consider including Leveraged ETFs? The pricing under ask stockgpt is outdated!
Yes, stockgpt chatbot has price that is outdated by a few days because it has been taking too long to get data uploaded in time each day. This is a limitation that requires us to build a solution that is a bit more complex than anticipated so we are on it.
As per adding leveraged ETFs, maybe i can build something separate that shows recommendations outside the current ETF recommendations structure. I replied to your previously message about this saying that the only reason we exclude this is because it skews the data of the overall system since the underlying security is just leverage added on top of its non-leveraged product hence making the data redundant. Adding this would mean we are giving double or triple weight to something that is synthetic. Ultimately even if I created something new, to account for all this, I would have to give the leveraged product the same score and rating as it’s unleveraged counterpart meaning if you are interested in the TQQQ you could just look at the ranking and rating of the QQQ as it would work out the same.
It is outdated by 1 year or more just check price of TECL
It would be great to breakdown performance in different time frames: Daily, Weekly, Monthly (20days), Qtrly, and then yearly
We have that on the site. Have you checked the mid term a d historical data section on the site or this substack? Like go to stockgpt.chat and look at what powers StockGPT section and see the mid term and historical data section and let me know what you think
I meant would it be possible to include it in the Spreadsheet for the individual stocks
I don’t think it would be a good idea to add it to the spreadsheet and here is why... The stocks we are ranking as “buy” or “strong buy” is because those stocks have become undervalued and oversold which means in the recent past they may have actually gone down but they have only gone down just enough to still be considered a great value. If we show their performance of the recent past many people may get demotivated from being interested in these stocks thinking these may continue to perform bad in the future as well. We have done a ton of analysis to know these are the stocks that outperforms but most people’s flawed beliefs are that stocks that are in an uptrend are those that performs which we have disproven many times over across 30 years of market analysis. Therefore, showing anything that feels conflicting to our message would be counterproductive. Given this explanation, do you agree its best to leave that out?